New York Times foreign policy analyst Thomas L. Friedman has finally admitted that his enthusiasm for invading Iraq was misguided, but his limited mea culpa hasn't stopped him from insulting Americans who opposed the war before the killing began.

Now the questions are: Why should Americans listen to an "expert" who got the biggest post-Cold War foreign policy story wrong? And why doesn't Friedman have the decency to resign?

For the full story on why commentators who went along with an unprovoked invasion should share in the blame, go to the independent ConsortiumNews.Com.