Political Justice Predates Gonzales
Editor's Note: This story demonstrates the kind of historical context American journalism needs to provide readers to foster an informed electorate in a democratic society as outlined in the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution granting special rights to the press. This story was intended to be a sidebar to a major piece of explanatory journalism for a national online magazine, but the editor in far out San Francisco only seemed interested in a smoking gun involving Karl Rove and Attorney General Alberto Gonzales. It is a forlorn statement about the sad state of American journalism, but there it is. Long live the Web press.
by Glynn Wilson
While Washington press corps sharks circle and smell blood in the water surrounding Attorney General Alberto Gonzales in the case of the firing of eight federal prosecutors, it might be worth it for them to swim back and circle in a school around some historical information proving that the U.S. Department of Justice has long been a cesspool for political prosecutions.
While it is most likely true that the abuses are worse than ever under the administration of President George W. Bush, with political animals like Karl Rove and Vice President Dick Cheney calling the shots, the politization of justice in America didn't start on a dime in January, 2005 when Gonzales was confirmed by the U.S. Senate and sworn in as attorney general.
In fact, not long after the U.S. Supreme Court handed Bush the hanging chad election of 2000 over then Vice President Al Gore, over at the new Bush Justice Department, Attorney General John "Eagle Sore" Ashcroft was busy running off Clinton appointees to make room for a new cadre of Federalist Society fascists and Bush Republican loyalists.
Not long after Bush was sworn in as president in January, 2001, a memo went out to all 93 U.S. attorneys offices around the country offering "early retirement" to anyone who had enough time in and wanted to leave to make room for new, young Bush appointees.
Down in Alabama, where Bush's political strategist Karl Rove had already orchestrated a Republican takeover of the state judiciary, the early retirement package landed on the desk of U.S. Attorney Michael Rasmussen. Rasmussen's early retirement would change the course of history in one of the most famous political and business prosecutions in U.S. history.
Rasmussen was a Clinton appointee who, along with the FBI, had started the investigation of HealthSouth founder Richard Scrushy for cooking the books in one of the biggest corporate fraud scandals ever.
Facing the prospect of working under a Bush Justice Department hell bent on changing priorities, however, and unhappy with the way the Scrushy investigation was proceeding, Rasmussen took the early retirement offer. That cleared the way for Bush to appoint Federalist Society member and Bush campaign contributor Alice Martin as U.S. attorney for the Northern District of Alabama.
Legal experts in Alabama and around the country say putting Martin, a former nurse, in charge of that office in the middle of the Scrushy investigation was about like appointing Michael "Brownie" Brown to run the Federal Emergency Management Agency prior to Hurricane Katrina.
When the prosecution of Scrushy collapsed in the winter and spring of 2005 and a Birmingham jury found Scrushy "not guilty," some in the legal community began questioning the wisdom of appointing less qualified Bush loyalists as federal prosecutors.
"I think they would have had a more effective case if they had kept Michael Rasmussen there," prominent Birmingham attorney Joe Whatley said during the Scrushy trial in Birmingham. "Rasmussen was a very effective prosecutor."
But it is also worth noting that political prosecutions by the U.S. Justice Department in Alabama did not even begin when Bush was elected in 2000. To learn the whole truth, you have to delve even further into the past.
Looking back on the record to the 1980s and the Department of Justice under President Ronald Reagan, Vice President Herbert Walker Bush and Attorney General Edwin Meese reveals another highly political time for justice in America.
A case could be made that the seed was planted for the prosecution of Richard Scrushy and former Alabama Governor Don Siegelman in the 1980s. At that time, U.S. Attorney Frank Donaldson, a Reagan appointee, had instigated an investigation of Birmingham's first black mayor, the popular educator Richard Arrington, who served five terms from 1979-1995.
In the months prior to the Birmingham mayoral election in October 1991, Arrington's second to last campaign, the Justice Department announced that it was investigating Arrington as "an unindicted co-conspirator" in a probe of alleged corruption at City Hall - on complaints filed by unnamed citizens, which later turned out to be one attempted entrapment set up after another.
The day after the announcement, HealthSouth CEO Richard Scrushy, who was flying high with his new chain of out patient hospitals, spoke out against the Bush 41 Justice Department on Arrington's behalf. Scrushy's speech, which has been completely ignored by the national and local news media, came at a luncheon to honor Arrington as Birmingham's first black mayor.
The announcement of an investigation "cast a real veil on me then," Arrington said in an interview. "At that lunch, (Scrushy) got up and criticized the feds and expressed total confidence in me," he said. "That took a lot of guts."
When asked if he thought there were leftovers of the big battle between the U.S. Justice Department under Reagan and Bush 41 in the 1980s and his administration at Birmingham City Hall, he said it is not only possible, but likely.
"I think there are things that make it possible that there's still some taste in their mouths about that situation," Arrington said. "When Richard Scrushy stood up at that luncheon, a fund raiser for me, with the corporate people there, and expressed his total confidence in me and criticized the U.S. attorneys office, a week following that he had feds down there in his office questioning his staff and some of his physicians."
After an eight year-long investigation of Arrington and on the eve of Donaldson's retirement - after William Jefferson Clinton was elected president in November, 1992 – Donaldson announced publicly that the Arrington investigation was over and no charges would be filed.
But that is still not the whole story. To get to the bottom of it, you have to go back a little further to an investigation prior to the first Republican governor's election in Alabama since Reconstruction.
In 1985, the Reagan Justice Department had a chance to investigate a federal employee named Guy Hunt, who was forced to resign as a Reagan appointee from the Agriculture Stabilization and Conservation Service for using his office and staff for political purposes to run for governor.
A Reagan appointed U.S. attorney in Montgomery failed to bring charges against Hunt in that case, a case which is documented at length in a book about the Department of Justice by former New York Times reporter David Burnham. The book, which was published by Scribner in 1995, is called Above the Law: Secret Deals, Political Fixes and Other Misadventures of the U.S. Department of Justice. (The author of this story is cited in the text, the acknowledgements and the index for the chapter on his investigation of Guy Hunt).
The main thesis in the book, nailed best in that chapter, is that massive evidence showed the Reagan Justice Department spent more time and money investigating apparently innocent black Democrats and allowing guilty Republicans to go free.
In one of the biggest fluke elections at least in Alabama history, Hunt went on to win the governor's race in 1986 after a major legal and political brawl tainted the state Democratic Party.
Hunt would later be convicted and removed from office in a state prosecution for pocketing $200,000 from an account set up to pay for his inauguration. Hunt was not sentenced to any jail time, however, and received probation in part on the recommendation of assistant Attorney General Steve Feaga. Hunt was later pardoned by the parole board under the administration of Republican Governor Fob James.
Ironically, Feaga is now an assistant U.S. attorney and one of the two lead prosecutors in the federal prosecution of former Alabama Governor Don Siegelman. Feaga recommended a 30-year sentence for Seigelman, 25 years for Scrushy.
A Republican judge appointed by Bush in 2002 sentenced Siegelman to seven years and four months in federal prison. Chief U.S. District Judge Mark E. Fuller sentenced Scrushy to six years and 10 months, and then ordered the U.S. Marshals Service to handcuff and shackle both defendants and take them to jail immediately, without so much as a hug and a goodbye to their families waiting in the courtroom.
According to legal experts, that is unprecedented in white-collar cases.
And now there are many who are starting to ask the obvious question: Was the Siegelman, Scrushy prosecution political form the outset?
Representative Artur Davis, a rising black star in the Democratic Party and a member of the House Judiciary Committee, wrote a letter July 6 asking Rep. John Conyers, chairman of the committee, to investigate.
A spokeswoman for Senator Patrick Leahy, D-Vermont, the chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee, said last week that the committee had no plans to investigate the Siegelman case since there was a jury in the case and since it is on appeal.
But the Senate Judiciary Committee has not ruled out an investigation, according to Tracy Schmaler, Leahy's inner circle communications director, who said the door is still open.
"We will look at all relevant information," she said.
Comments
This is a very good and TRUE story, Glynn! You are to be praised for this, by letting the truth come out and helping to keep the people informed.
We know that this adminstration is the one that needs investigating.
As for Fega, Fuller, Franklin and the rest...what about behind their closet doors?
We need to do them like they had done Don and Scrushy!
Posted by: Sarah Smith | July 13, 2007 07:26 PM
I have a problem with the time line you present.
"Rasmussen was a Clinton appointee who, along with the FBI, had started the investigation of HealthSouth founder Richard Scrushy for cooking the books in one of the biggest corporate fraud scandals ever."
"Legal experts in Alabama and around the country say putting Martin, a former nurse, in charge of that office in the middle of the Scrushy investigation was about like appointing Michael "Brownie" Brown to run the Federal Emergency Management Agency prior to Hurricane Katrina."
If Alice Martin was appointed September 29, 2001 and Weston Smith went to the Feds on March 11, 2003, how could she be put "in charge of that office in the middle of the Scrushy investigation." The FBI investigation into the cooking of the books at Healthsouth didn't begin until some 17 months AFTER she was appointed.
Posted by: james pockstaller | July 15, 2007 05:15 PM
James: Your problem is not my problem. Get your head around this.
You are just wrong about that, and you are making wrong conclusions based on local press coverage, which may be understandable.
I interviewed Rasmussen and the FBI during the Scrushy trial in Birmingham, and I have those interviews on a digital recording still, just as I have the Arrington interview recorded.
Just because you didn't find out about the investigation until Weston Smith came forward, or maybe because you think you have done a bit of clever online dating, does not mean the investigation was not already ongoing.
I was not in Alabama following this until the trial started in Birmingham, so my memory is not perfect at all on what all went down. I never met Scrushy and didn't hate him like everyone else here. In other words, I was the most objective man in the room in the Hugo Black federal courthouse in Birmingham. I didn't care what happened to him then, and I don't care now, except to the extent that justice is served according to the rule of law and democracy.
I had to catch up on all the reading on the case to write about it for the New York Times. Now you may hate the Times because Rush Limbaugh says it is a "liberal" newspaper, but the fact is, I was there, in the courtroom, covering it, myself, with my own eyes, empirically.
Were you?
And now, are you willing to accept the fact that any governor of any state can be subjected to this kind of treatment by this administration?
Ask yourself, honestly: What if the shoe were on the other foot? If it were a Democratic Party dominated administration and a Democrat judge jailed a Republican governor, maybe Guy Hunt, would you feel the same way?
That is the test of objectivity in this case. Can you pass it?
I know I can...
Posted by: fast2write
|
July 15, 2007 06:04 PM
Furthermore, I do appreciate the traffic and interest guys, but I sincerely wish you would for once deal with the substantive questions raised in my posts, rather than trying to find one little number you think I get wrong and attacking me and saying I am not a journalist or a writer of some note. If you thought that, and you didn't understand that I have some real power at my disposal here, I suspect you wouldn't be here.
Some of my friends in places like New Orleans, for example, think the people of this state are at a point where they simply can no longer question the system or the fact that justice could be manipulated for political purposes. When did that change? The people of Alabama, and especially conservatives, have long railed against "the fedral govamnt."
Is it that you think the South has finally won the Civil War in the form of Bush and his ilk now running the federal government? Have you lost your ability to question authority? Is it because Riley prays for rain that you are so willing to accept living in a police state?
I would be curious to know, as a journalist and as an academic. If you belittle me on either one of these counts, I am going to delete your posts. This is not a free-for-all. I'm trying to moderate this discussion so that it makes sense to those who truly want to learn something - not just attack the messenger.
Posted by: fast2write
|
July 15, 2007 06:29 PM